Marine Corps technology chief unveils latest network and command and control efforts

Marine Corps technology chief unveils latest network and command and control efforts

The Marine Corps’ technology chief provided an update on how the service will contribute to the Department of Defense’s plan to connect all weapons and sensors across the military.

Work on the Corps’ network and command and control systems is being undertaken in preparation for operations involving small units deployed as observers and gunners for larger coalition forces.

“It’s all about data,” Kevin Murray said April 30 during a panel discussion at the Modern Day Marine Conference in Washington, D.C. Ultimately, additional surveillance data from other sources If the data is missing or unavailable, the Marines cannot conduct small force operations because they pass on the targeting data they collect.

To that end, Murray said the Corps is working on both Project Dynamis, the service’s contribution to the Department of Defense’s Joint All Domain Command and Control Initiative (CJADC2), and a network integration plan.

During the recent Acquisition Office reorganization at Marine Corps Systems Command and Program Executive Directorate Land Systems, the service created the Marine Corps Air-Ground Task Force Command and Control Program Office. Previously, ground command and control systems belonged to MCSC, and aviation-related C2 systems belonged to PEO LS.

Despite the new program office, Murray said the Corps still lacks the elements to structure and coordinate contributions to CJADC2.

“We’re not going to solve CJADC2 for the joint force, but we’re going to look at how we can contribute and fit into it,” he said of Project Dynamis. Work is underway to coordinate with the U.S. Indo-Pacific Command’s combat management system, the Joint Fires Network. The Navy’s secret project is the Overmatch Project. Army experiment series “Project Convergence.” and the Air Force and Space Force’s DAF Combat Network and Advanced Combat Management System.

“The ability to communicate across the Marine Corps, across the joint force, across the partner coalition. That’s the No. 1 capability that I think we need to accelerate,” said Gen. David Walsh, head of Marine Corps Systems Command. Ta.

As for him, he is a brigadier general. Gen. Stephen Lightfoot, director of the Capability Development Directorate, which oversees the Marine Corps’ requirements, said that while the Marine Corps enjoys self-sufficient sea, air and ground task forces, “we probably have a I have no intention of participating in any combat.” Future as a Marine. As the United States, we will work with our allies and partners to address this issue. ”

“And that’s how we have to fight, and this really shows the importance of CJADC2,” he added. “If our systems can’t work together, we have to break them up. They have to work together so that we can work together.”

While the Corps is considering how data flows between integrated and integrated C2 systems, it is also concerned about how data flows within its own web of networks.

Murray noted that the Marine Corps is focused on ensuring the Marine Corps Enterprise Network can extend to the tactical edge, and that there are various network modernization plans underway across all services. Stated.

Cloud computing and processing power has evolved to allow Marines in the field to have significant data processing power in a much smaller form factor. But if connected to the Corps’ extensive network, it could have even more processing power and perform larger-scale data-driven operations.

However, fleets are concerned that losing connectivity will reduce the effectiveness of their setup.

The goal of network integration, Murray said, is to allow Marines on the Philippine island of Luzon, for example, to be “permanently connected to a big data cloud, but still be able to act tactically even if communications are cut off.” ” he said.his [Ultra Light Tactical Vehicle] And we continue to take advantage of locally available data by taking advantage of the amount of storage and capabilities we have there. And when they connect again, [the cloud]As we become more permissive, what we’re trying to do for network integration is all about the opportunity to resynchronize with the larger architecture. ”

Murray said the plan also comes with cybersecurity benefits.

“Our traditional network architecture wasn’t really defensible. It was all over the place. Some of it was tactical networks that didn’t have a cyber defense plan,” he noted. “This integration is extremely helpful in streamlining, visualizing, and defending your network.”

Megan Eckstein is a naval warfare reporter for Defense News. She has reported military news since 2009, focusing on U.S. Navy and Marine Corps operations, acquisition programs, and budgets. Geographically she reports from four fleets and she is happiest when she is filing articles from ships. Megan is a graduate of the University of Maryland.

Source link

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *